Chest
Volume 161, Issue 4, April 2022, Pages 949-959
Journal home page for Chest

COPD: Original Research
Significance of FEV3/FEV6 in Recognition of Early Airway Disease in Smokers at Risk of Development of COPD: Analysis of the SPIROMICS Cohort

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chest.2021.10.046Get rights and content

Background

Small airways are known to be affected early in the course of COPD; however, traditional spirometric indices may not accurately identify small airways disease.

Research Question

Can forced expiratory volume in 3 s/forced expiratory volume in 6 s (FEV3/FEV6) identify early airflow abnormalities and predict future clinically important respiratory-related outcomes, including development of COPD?

Study Design and Methods

The study included 832 current and former smokers with post-bronchodilator FEV1/FVC ≥ 0.7 from the Subpopulations and Intermediate Outcome Measures in COPD Study (SPIROMICS) cohort. Participants were classified as having a reduced pre-bronchodilator FEV3/FEV6 based on lower limit of normal (LLN) values. Repeatability analysis was performed for FEV3 and FEV6. Regression modeling was used to evaluate the relationship between baseline FEV3/FEV6 and outcome measures, including functional small airways disease, on thoracic imaging and respiratory exacerbations. Interval-censored analysis was used to assess progression to COPD.

Results

FEV3/FEV6 less than the LLN at baseline, defined as reduced compared with FEV3/FEV6 at or above the LLN, was associated with lower FEV1, poorer health status (St. George’s Respiratory Questionnaire score), more emphysema, and more functional small airways disease on quantitative imaging. FEV3 and FEV6 showed excellent agreement between repeat measurements. A reduced FEV3/FEV6 was associated with increased odds of a severe respiratory exacerbation within the first year of follow-up and decreased time to first exacerbation. A low FEV3/FEV6 was also associated with development of COPD according to spirometry results (post-bronchodilator FEV1/FVC < 0.7) during study follow-up.

Interpretation

FEV3/FEV6 is a routinely available and repeatable spirometric index that can be useful in the evaluation of early airflow obstruction in current and former smokers without COPD. A reduced FEV3/FEV6 can identify those at risk for future development of COPD and respiratory exacerbations.

Clinical Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov; No.: NCT01969344; URL: www.clinicaltrials.gov: ClinicalTrials.gov.

Section snippets

Study Design and Participants

SPIROMICS is a multicenter observational study that enrolled current and former smokers (≥ 20 pack-years) aged 40 to 80 years with and without COPD defined according to post-bronchodilator spirometry results who were followed up longitudinally from 2010 to 2015.20 This study focused on participants who were current or former smokers (≥ 20 pack-years) without a diagnosis of COPD at baseline (post-bronchodilator FEV1/FVC ≥ 0.7) with available FEV3 and FEV6 measurements (N = 832). In this study,

Results

In the cohort of current or former smokers without COPD (≥ 20 pack-years with post-bronchodilator FEV1/FVC ≥ 0.7), pre-bronchodilator FEV3/FEV6 was abnormal in 17.2% (n = 143) of participants at baseline. The corresponding proportions for the overall SPIROMICS cohort with available FEV3/FEV6 data are included in e-Table 2. Median follow-up time was 48.0 months for participants with normal FEV3/FEV6 and 50.4 months for participants with reduced FEV3/FEV6. Baseline characteristics of this cohort

Discussion

The current study evaluated FEV3/FEV6 as a metric of early airflow obstruction and explored the role and significance of this spirometric measure in predicting outcomes in the SPIROMICS cohort. Among current and former smokers without COPD (baseline post-bronchodilator FEV1/FVC ≥ 0.7), we found that participants with a reduced pre-bronchodilator FEV3/FEV6 had a greater burden of respiratory disease, more emphysema, and functional SAD by quantitative imaging, and higher rates of respiratory

Interpretation

A reduced FEV3/FEV6 in current and former smokers without COPD identifies individuals who are at risk of experiencing respiratory exacerbations and developing COPD. It is a simple, routinely available, and reproducible metric with potential to aid with early identification and timely intervention in people at risk for COPD. The study data suggest that interpretation of spirometry results beyond FEV1 and FVC can offer additional relevant clinical insights in this population.

Take-home Points

Study

Acknowledgments

Author contributions: D. M., I. Z. B., and N. Y. had full access to the data and take responsibility for the integrity of the data and accuracy of the analysis; N. Y., D. M., R. G. Buhr, D. P. T., and I. Z. B. were involved in the design of the analysis; N. Y., D. M., R. G. Buhr, D. P. T., and I. Z. B. contributed to the drafting of the manuscript; and C. B. C., D. C., , E. A. H., F. J. M., J. L. C., J. M. W., M. A., M. B. D., M. K. H., R. G. Barr, R. P., S. F., V. K., V. E. O., W. H. A. , P.

References (49)

  • D. Singh et al.

    Small airway disease in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: insights and implications for the clinician

    Curr Opin Pulm Med

    (2020)
  • R. Pellegrino et al.

    Interpretative strategies for lung function tests

    Eur Respir J

    (2005)
  • Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease. Global strategy for the diagnosis, management, and prevention...
  • E.A. Regan et al.

    Clinical and radiologic disease in smokers with normal spirometry

    JAMA Intern Med

    (2015)
  • E.S. Wan et al.

    Clinical and radiographic predictors of GOLD-unclassified smokers in the COPDGene study

    Am J Respir Crit Care Med

    (2011)
  • P.G. Woodruff et al.

    Clinical significance of symptoms in smokers with preserved pulmonary function

    N Engl J Med

    (2016)
  • F.J. Martinez et al.

    At the root: defining and halting progression of early chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

    Am J Respir Crit Care Med

    (2018)
  • B.G. Harvey et al.

    Risk of COPD with obstruction in active smokers with normal spirometry and reduced diffusion capacity

    Eur Respir J

    (2015)
  • A.A. Lambert et al.

    Respiratory symptoms in smokers with normal spirometry: clinical significance and management considerations

    Curr Opin Pulm Med

    (2019)
  • J.E. Hansen et al.

    Re-defining lower limit of normal for FEV1/FEV6, FEV1/FVC, FEV3/FEV6 and FEV3/FVC to improve detection of airway obstruction

    Chronic Obstr Pulm Dis

    (2015)
  • M.P. Swanney et al.

    FEV(6) is an acceptable surrogate for FVC in the spirometric diagnosis of airway obstruction and restriction

    Am J Respir Crit Care Med

    (2000)
  • J.E. Hansen et al.

    Should forced expiratory volume in six seconds replace forced vital capacity to detect airway obstruction?

    Eur Respir J

    (2006)
  • D. Couper et al.

    Design of the Subpopulations and Intermediate Outcomes in COPD Study (SPIROMICS)

    Thorax

    (2014)
  • M.R. Miller et al.

    Standardisation of spirometry

    Eur Respir J

    (2005)
  • Cited by (11)

    • Small airways obstruction and its risk factors in the Burden of Obstructive Lung Disease (BOLD) study: a multinational cross-sectional study

      2023, The Lancet Global Health
      Citation Excerpt :

      A potential explanation is that damage to the small airways occurs early in the disease process. Therefore, the higher prevalence of small airways obstruction in this study than for traditional airflow obstruction reflects the inclusion of individuals with early airflow obstruction who might progress to chronic airflow obstruction in later life.8,12 Only studies in smokers and hospital-based populations have suggested a link between small airways obstruction and subsequent chronic obstructive pulmonary disease,8,12 and further studies, preferably longitudinal, in general populations are needed.

    • Progress in pre‑chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

      2023, Zhonghua Jiehe he Huxi Zazhi / Chinese Journal of Tuberculosis and Respiratory Diseases
    View all citing articles on Scopus

    The positions in the article do not necessarily reflect those of the Department of Veterans Affairs.

    FUNDING/SUPPORT: The Subpopulations and Intermediate Outcome Measures in COPD Study (SPIROMICS) was supported by contracts from the National Institutes of Health (NIH)/National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute [HHSN268200900013C, HHSN268200900014C, HHSN268200900015C, HHSN268200900016C, HHSN268200900017C, HHSN268200900018C, HHSN268200900019C, and HHSN268200900020C] and grants from the NIH/National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute [U01 HL137880 and U24 HL141762]. It was supplemented by contributions made through The Foundation for the National Institutes of Health and the COPD Foundation from AstraZeneca/MedImmune; Bayer; Bellerophon Therapeutics; Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; Chiesi Farmaceutici S.p.A.; Forest Research Institute, Inc.; GlaxoSmithKline; Grifols Therapeutics, Inc.; Ikaria, Inc.; Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation; Nycomed GmbH; ProterixBio; Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; Sanofi; Sunovion; Takeda Pharmaceutical Company; Theravance Biopharma; and Viatris.

    View full text