Take-home Points
Study
SPIROMICS is a multicenter observational study that enrolled current and former smokers (≥ 20 pack-years) aged 40 to 80 years with and without COPD defined according to post-bronchodilator spirometry results who were followed up longitudinally from 2010 to 2015.20 This study focused on participants who were current or former smokers (≥ 20 pack-years) without a diagnosis of COPD at baseline (post-bronchodilator FEV1/FVC ≥ 0.7) with available FEV3 and FEV6 measurements (N = 832). In this study,
In the cohort of current or former smokers without COPD (≥ 20 pack-years with post-bronchodilator FEV1/FVC ≥ 0.7), pre-bronchodilator FEV3/FEV6 was abnormal in 17.2% (n = 143) of participants at baseline. The corresponding proportions for the overall SPIROMICS cohort with available FEV3/FEV6 data are included in e-Table 2. Median follow-up time was 48.0 months for participants with normal FEV3/FEV6 and 50.4 months for participants with reduced FEV3/FEV6. Baseline characteristics of this cohort
The current study evaluated FEV3/FEV6 as a metric of early airflow obstruction and explored the role and significance of this spirometric measure in predicting outcomes in the SPIROMICS cohort. Among current and former smokers without COPD (baseline post-bronchodilator FEV1/FVC ≥ 0.7), we found that participants with a reduced pre-bronchodilator FEV3/FEV6 had a greater burden of respiratory disease, more emphysema, and functional SAD by quantitative imaging, and higher rates of respiratory
A reduced FEV3/FEV6 in current and former smokers without COPD identifies individuals who are at risk of experiencing respiratory exacerbations and developing COPD. It is a simple, routinely available, and reproducible metric with potential to aid with early identification and timely intervention in people at risk for COPD. The study data suggest that interpretation of spirometry results beyond FEV1 and FVC can offer additional relevant clinical insights in this population. Study Take-home Points
Author contributions: D. M., I. Z. B., and N. Y. had full access to the data and take responsibility for the integrity of the data and accuracy of the analysis; N. Y., D. M., R. G. Buhr, D. P. T., and I. Z. B. were involved in the design of the analysis; N. Y., D. M., R. G. Buhr, D. P. T., and I. Z. B. contributed to the drafting of the manuscript; and C. B. C., D. C., , E. A. H., F. J. M., J. L. C., J. M. W., M. A., M. B. D., M. K. H., R. G. Barr, R. P., S. F., V. K., V. E. O., W. H. A. , P.
A potential explanation is that damage to the small airways occurs early in the disease process. Therefore, the higher prevalence of small airways obstruction in this study than for traditional airflow obstruction reflects the inclusion of individuals with early airflow obstruction who might progress to chronic airflow obstruction in later life.8,12 Only studies in smokers and hospital-based populations have suggested a link between small airways obstruction and subsequent chronic obstructive pulmonary disease,8,12 and further studies, preferably longitudinal, in general populations are needed.
The positions in the article do not necessarily reflect those of the Department of Veterans Affairs.
FUNDING/SUPPORT: The Subpopulations and Intermediate Outcome Measures in COPD Study (SPIROMICS) was supported by contracts from the National Institutes of Health (NIH)/National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute [HHSN268200900013C, HHSN268200900014C, HHSN268200900015C, HHSN268200900016C, HHSN268200900017C, HHSN268200900018C, HHSN268200900019C, and HHSN268200900020C] and grants from the NIH/National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute [U01 HL137880 and U24 HL141762]. It was supplemented by contributions made through The Foundation for the National Institutes of Health and the COPD Foundation from AstraZeneca/MedImmune; Bayer; Bellerophon Therapeutics; Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; Chiesi Farmaceutici S.p.A.; Forest Research Institute, Inc.; GlaxoSmithKline; Grifols Therapeutics, Inc.; Ikaria, Inc.; Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation; Nycomed GmbH; ProterixBio; Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; Sanofi; Sunovion; Takeda Pharmaceutical Company; Theravance Biopharma; and Viatris.